When we supported the 20 anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall, drew media attention again focused on all countries of the so-called former Eastern Bloc. Despite the celebrations, speeches and ad hoc, there was the really interesting questions of these events, the perception of the past and vision for the future of these countries. Communist regimes have often been considered equal, regardless of differences, each country has its particular cultural identity and training hisorical considered. In fact, if we have two examples of this set of states, we must clearly understand not only the diversity in their past, but also the existing differences. Yugoslavia in particular an exception among the countries of Eastern Europe. The regime led by Tito has indeed been a Communist system in particular has an internal organization with a clear socialist foreign policy, which allowed the former Yugoslavia, and received valuable benefits to white combination. Apart from not ignorable with financial support from the east and west, so that private property has little decorum and the granting of an enviable quality of life compared for example to Russia, the former Yugoslavia in a position to keep the plate almost too heavy to believe: the best travel document in the world 50 years to the year1990, the so-called ‘red passports, the Yugoslav passport, it has its own, without a visa for almost all countries around the world including the United States and with the exception of Greece, Portugal, Spain (since they were under the dictatorship of travel right winged) and Russia (the) sub -mentioned reasons. If we compare these facts with the dark and tragic events of the sum of 90 years, it is not difficult to see why the debate about the communist era has been overcome by the ethnic tensions that make it n ‘ is not that difficult in the Middle East and especially in Poland and Czech Republic. In fact, among these, the communist system is not only related to a period of lack of political and economic freedom, but also and especially to a foreign adoption, especially by the USSR. The heart of why the differences between the center and Yugoslavia is very simple, the survival of the Soviet army. When the Red Army was militarly are necessary to defeat the occupation, he put his hand on the political and diplomatic, as he has imposed on his way commuism. In return, Yugoslavia, as he has released most of myself had the physical ability and moral “Kick Out the Russians in the country. In 1954, broke with Stalin, Tito was accused of using a non – Orthodox attempt fundamentally communist ideological justification to insist on the block along Yugoslav forcing the country to monitor the flow of the USSR. Therefore, the so-called non-aligned bloc on the Bandung Conference been established, essentially an agreement between Nehru, Prime Minister of India at that time, and Tito, who are gathered here all the States who will not be a candidate of the Cold War War colleagues. If after this analysis, the countries of the former Yugoslavia for “winning” the game seems to go back to the history of these areas, we find a difference of capital. Yugoslavia was primarily a historical tradition of very young children, because he has not been decided by a state since 1918, when the Berlin Conference, the winners of the First World War to implement the creation of a state where the Kingdom of Slovenes, Croats and Serbian. Secondly, there has never been very marginal to the broad guidelines of the European cultural history (Renaissance, the Enlightenment, and so on) have participated. Instead, Central and Eastern European countries has a long tradition that the concerns of their national identity and they are also very involved and contributed to cultural and social movements. The beautiful view of Prague, the Czech Republic for talks, while Kapucínské is a good benchmark for Poland. Family of the author, the kings of Poland have always been loved by his people, said the fair, another as a volunteer or as a devout man, and another has inherited a country of wood and the stone he has left. Only with a walk in one of the many parks of Warsaw, one can see the legacy of the Enlightenment in Poland: the freedom to walk in the gardens of kings and if time permits, the opportunity to assist passengers at a classical concert. Aware that politics and culture are closely related, we can not fail to note that despite differences, merging political phenomenon more Off all the countries of the former Eastern bloc are essentially two: a superb nationalism and an obsession for the recent past. In different versions of the obsession is for the establishment of national identity found in business terms both internally and externally as a top priority for all countries mentioned above. However, if this process is understandable, it is justified in the Western Balkans, where ethnic lines occurred armed conflict, as in Central Europe and Eastern Europe (CEE) and the collapse of communism has not created a war and how they are already members of the EU. Indeed, the CEECs seem to have forgotten their history full of cultural integration on the European continent. L European Union is, in fact, not only on the achievements of the ECSC or the Maastricht Treaty provided for, but it can claim a long cultural tradition common and often painful history. The road is apparently widespread, and perceptions of history have strongly converged in recent decades, some leading historians of the Second World War, when the definition of a civil war between the Europeans to overcome the nationalist vision of history. Thus, we can just say that in case of rejection European flag at the castle of the President of the Republic in Prague and / or pushing through the national and European policy is a step-up-to-date anti-communist rhetoric and / or confirmation of the unique acquiescence n ‘ not help the country to focus on the common European history, but rather they are divisions, Europe has been held before and during and after the Cold War to European integration. As is, is of central importance to the welfare of the European Union, a significant improvement in the convergence of member states and candidates present and future, not only economic but in political terms, finally, so far, the only certainty, the fact that this phenomenon represents in the Western Balkans can be adjusted by the requirements of the EU, while in CEE convergence greater political and cultural development is mainly due to its own course If the EU continues to seek to play a leading role in building democracy and execution.
